Federal Wire Fraud

The Law Offices of Brandon Sample has worked with many clients on defeating federal wire fraud charges against them. Fraud lawyer Brandon Sample has represented numerous defendants facing federal wire fraud charges from indictment through their appeals.


Federal wire fraud is discussed in 18 U.S.C. 1343. To be convicted of federal wire fraud, the government must show that the defendant voluntarily and intentionally designed or participated in a fraudulent scheme to take money from another person or organization, used an interstate wire communication to commit the fraudulent scheme and that the intention of the defendant was to use the wire communication to defraud someone else. Federal wire fraud charges are very similar to federal mail fraud charges, except that wire fraud involves the use of a phone or internet communication instead of the U.S. Post Office. It is not difficult for the federal government to gain jurisdiction over a wire fraud crime because many of the communications used in these fraudulent schemes are sent over the internet, which is presumed to be a part of interstate commerce.


The Basics of Federal Wire Fraud

One of the aspects that allows federal prosecutors such great latitude in prosecuting federal wire fraud crimes is that they do not have to show that any victim was actually harmed as a result of the criminal activity. For example, in a kickback scheme, the consumer may not have been forced to pay more money for a good or service that he received, but the public still had to part with money that it would have rightfully owned. Thus, it would be a shortsighted mistake to assume that the lack of an individual victim in an alleged wire fraud case means that the individual charged with the wire fraud crime will get off the hook. Deterrence and media headlines cannot be underestimated as strong motivators for federal prosecutors in pursuing federal wire fraud crime investigations. This is one reason why it is so important to hire a fraud lawyer as soon as possible.


Sometimes, federal prosecutors tack on federal wire fraud charges to a defendant being investigated for other crimes because the prosecutor is not confident that the other federal charges will stick. Because the threshold for proving a federal wire fraud crime is so low in comparison to other federal offenses, federal wire fraud becomes the way that a prosecutor can secure a conviction against a defendant who may be involved in other illegal activities.


A potential defense to some federal wire fraud crimes is that the defendant was acting in good faith and did not have the intent to defraud another individual or organization. This is not always a viable defense, but if a defendant can show that he consulted with an attorney before engaging in the transaction at issue, this is a strong fact in favor of a good faith defense. Another frequent defense in the context of a wire fraud crime involving a sale transaction is puffery. This means that a sales person was only using colorful language to secure a sale instead of intentionally lying to a customer. The availability of these basic defenses always depends on the facts of the case at hand. A fraud attorney such as Bradon Sample can help you explore such defenses.

Federal Sentencing Guidelines

The penalties that could potentially be imposed on a person convicted of a federal wire fraud offense include federal prison time and fines. For just one count of federal wire fraud for a first time offender, there may be a prison sentence of up to 20 years imposed. If the federal wire fraud scheme involves any property or activities related to federal emergency or disaster relief services, the potential sentence upon conviction is increased to up to 30 years in prison. In addition, a person convicted could be forced to pay fines totaling up to $1,000,000. By hiring a fraud lawyer as soon as possible, you may be able to mitigate your criminal and civil liabilities.


What makes the potential penalties for being convicted of a federal wire fraud crime so troubling is that the federal district court judge may impose these penalties for each individual count of wire fraud for which a defendant is convicted. A defendant facing federal wire fraud charges is also typically subject to other federal charges because of the nature of the criminal activity involved. The more counts and charges that a defendant is convicted of, the greater the potential that he will have to serve several separate prison sentences or consecutive sentences. There is also no guarantee that the defendant will be able to serve those sentences concurrently, which means that they are essentially additional prison terms tacked onto the initial one.

BrandonSample_Final Logo_white-03

What are the Common Defenses to Federal Drug Charges?

A prudent defendant in a federal drug case will consult with an experienced drug charge lawyer to find out if his Fourth Amendment rights were violated during the search and seizure by law enforcement offices. Law enforcement must follow all search and seizure proper procedures so as not to violate a suspect’s due process rights. There certainly may be other defenses available to you in your federal drug case, but many defendants facing drug charges end up challenging whether proper search and seizure protocols were followed by law enforcement officers. Our drug charge attorneys are well-versed in Fourth Amendment challenges to improper search and seizure in drug cases, such as when drug possession charges are brought by federal prosecutors.

Experienced Fraud Lawyers Ready to Help

Call the Law Offices of Brandon Sample at 802-444-HELP (4357) today to schedule a consultation with fraud lawyer Brandon Sample about your federal wire fraud case. This is the first step you can take in fighting to secure your freedom and protect your financial assets from seizure by the federal government. The sooner you make the call to fraud attorney Brandon Sample about your wire fraud case, the closer you will be to developing a diligent defense strategy for these serious charges.